Comparison of patient rated treatment response with measured improvement in Parkinson's disease
Identifieur interne : 000046 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000045; suivant : 000047Comparison of patient rated treatment response with measured improvement in Parkinson's disease
Auteurs : Matthew B. Davidson [Royaume-Uni] ; David J M. Mcghee [Royaume-Uni] ; Carl E. Counsell [Royaume-Uni]Source :
- Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry [ 0022-3050 ] ; 2012-10.
Abstract
Background A marked response to dopamine replacement therapy is important in supporting a diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD). The aim of the study was to compare PD patients' subjective rating of improvement with measured improvement on a number of scales. Methods People with clinically defined PD were identified from a prospective long term follow-up study of incident parkinsonian patients. Changes in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) (activities of daily living and motor subsections), timed tests and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire, full version, between assessments immediately before starting adequate dopamine replacement and the two subsequent follow-up assessments (mean 6 and 12 months after baseline) were calculated. These were compared with the patients' own subjective ratings of improvement (nil, slight, moderate, good, excellent). Results 133 patients were included (mean age 71 years, 56% men). Thirty-eight patients were treated with a dopamine agonist and 95 with l-dopa (median l-dopa equivalent dose 300 mg). Most patients showed improvements in their measured scores but there was no statistically significant association between these scores and the patient subjective response, except for the motor UPDRS at the first follow-up. A third of those who showed no improvement in their motor UPDRS at the first follow-up rated their improvement as moderate or better, while 29% of those whose motor UPDRS improved by over 50% said they had no or slight improvement. Conclusion PD patients' subjective ratings of their degree of improvement often do not accurately reflect the degree of objective change in parkinsonian impairment or disability. Clinicians should record a simple measure of motor impairment before and after treatment to assess treatment response more accurately.
Url:
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-302741
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>Comparison of patient rated treatment response with measured improvement in Parkinson's disease</title><author><name sortKey="Davidson, Matthew B" sort="Davidson, Matthew B" uniqKey="Davidson M" first="Matthew B" last="Davidson">Matthew B. Davidson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mcghee, David J M" sort="Mcghee, David J M" uniqKey="Mcghee D" first="David J M" last="Mcghee">David J M. Mcghee</name></author><author><name sortKey="Counsell, Carl E" sort="Counsell, Carl E" uniqKey="Counsell C" first="Carl E" last="Counsell">Carl E. Counsell</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:E82475E6E919B991299177066D8B2B37339088B5</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1136/jnnp-2012-302741</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/E82475E6E919B991299177066D8B2B37339088B5/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">002615</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">002275</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000046</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">Comparison of patient rated treatment response with measured improvement in Parkinson's disease</title><author><name sortKey="Davidson, Matthew B" sort="Davidson, Matthew B" uniqKey="Davidson M" first="Matthew B" last="Davidson">Matthew B. Davidson</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Aberdeen</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mcghee, David J M" sort="Mcghee, David J M" uniqKey="Mcghee D" first="David J M" last="Mcghee">David J M. Mcghee</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Aberdeen</wicri:noRegion></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">Royaume-Uni</country></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Counsell, Carl E" sort="Counsell, Carl E" uniqKey="Counsell C" first="Carl E" last="Counsell">Carl E. Counsell</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Aberdeen</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-3050</idno><idno type="eISSN">1468-330X</idno><imprint><publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><date type="published" when="2012-10">2012-10</date><biblScope unit="volume">83</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">10</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1001">1001</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0022-3050</idno></series><idno type="istex">E82475E6E919B991299177066D8B2B37339088B5</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1136/jnnp-2012-302741</idno><idno type="href">jnnp-83-1001.pdf</idno><idno type="ArticleID">jnnp-2012-302741</idno><idno type="PMID">22626942</idno><idno type="local">jnnp;83/10/1001</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0022-3050</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Background A marked response to dopamine replacement therapy is important in supporting a diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD). The aim of the study was to compare PD patients' subjective rating of improvement with measured improvement on a number of scales. Methods People with clinically defined PD were identified from a prospective long term follow-up study of incident parkinsonian patients. Changes in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) (activities of daily living and motor subsections), timed tests and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire, full version, between assessments immediately before starting adequate dopamine replacement and the two subsequent follow-up assessments (mean 6 and 12 months after baseline) were calculated. These were compared with the patients' own subjective ratings of improvement (nil, slight, moderate, good, excellent). Results 133 patients were included (mean age 71 years, 56% men). Thirty-eight patients were treated with a dopamine agonist and 95 with l-dopa (median l-dopa equivalent dose 300 mg). Most patients showed improvements in their measured scores but there was no statistically significant association between these scores and the patient subjective response, except for the motor UPDRS at the first follow-up. A third of those who showed no improvement in their motor UPDRS at the first follow-up rated their improvement as moderate or better, while 29% of those whose motor UPDRS improved by over 50% said they had no or slight improvement. Conclusion PD patients' subjective ratings of their degree of improvement often do not accurately reflect the degree of objective change in parkinsonian impairment or disability. Clinicians should record a simple measure of motor impairment before and after treatment to assess treatment response more accurately.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Royaume-Uni</li></country></list><tree><country name="Royaume-Uni"><noRegion><name sortKey="Davidson, Matthew B" sort="Davidson, Matthew B" uniqKey="Davidson M" first="Matthew B" last="Davidson">Matthew B. Davidson</name></noRegion><name sortKey="Counsell, Carl E" sort="Counsell, Carl E" uniqKey="Counsell C" first="Carl E" last="Counsell">Carl E. Counsell</name><name sortKey="Mcghee, David J M" sort="Mcghee, David J M" uniqKey="Mcghee D" first="David J M" last="Mcghee">David J M. Mcghee</name><name sortKey="Mcghee, David J M" sort="Mcghee, David J M" uniqKey="Mcghee D" first="David J M" last="Mcghee">David J M. Mcghee</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/ParkinsonV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000046 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000046 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sante
|area= ParkinsonV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:E82475E6E919B991299177066D8B2B37339088B5
|texte= Comparison of patient rated treatment response with measured improvement in Parkinson's disease
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |